CODE OF ETHICAL STANDARDS - POLICE.
YESTERDAY MY DAUGHTER ENDURED TORTURE, TRAFFIKKED AGAINST HER WILL. THE POLICE ARE USING HER AS SOME KIND OF A SECRET OPERATION TOOL TO HELP THEM MAKE ARRESTS - APPARANTLY TO STOP THE SEX TRAFFIKKING CHAIN IN PARIS FOR THEIR OWN DAUGHTER'S AND GRANDCHILDREN (BUT NOT FOR MINE): BUT TO PROTECT THEIR FAMILIES AND ENDANGER MINE!
IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WHEN POLICE USE A VULNERABLE PERSON AS A TOOL FOR THEIR OPERATIONS, THAT HELP THEM MAKE ARRESTS AND GET THEM PROMOTIONS THE CORRECT WAY, THAT VULNERABLE PERSON IS SUPPOSED TO BE ENSURED POLICE PROTECTION; BUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THAT PROTECTION FAILS AND POLICE BREACH THEIR CONTRACT? BY RIGHT, THAT PERSON IS SUPPOSED TO BE RELEASED!
THAT PERSON IS MY DAUGHTER, BOTH HER CHILDREN AND MY BROTHER, SERGIO GELICRISIO; WHO HAVE BEEN DETAINED AGAINST THEIR WILL, KEPT FROM MAKING ANY CONTACT WITH ME AND LIED TO. IS THIS POLICE PROTECTION UNDER THE GUIDLINES OF THE:
"Code of ethics of the police and the gendarmerie in France?"
FURTHERMORE, THEY HAD ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT IN THE FIRST PLACE TO INVOLVE A PERSON WHO IS A VICTIM (OF THEIR CRIMES OF CORRUPTION), WHO IS NOW AS A RESULT OF A DRUG HABIT THEY FORCED ON HER, UNABLE TO MAKE HER OWN DECISIONS REGARDING HER WELFARE AND PERSONAL SAFETY - KRISTEN DYER-CAMPBELL (MY DAUGHTER) - AND IN ADDITION, PREVENT HER OWN MOTHER FROM MAKING CONTACT WITH HER DAUGHTER THAT, APPOINTED AS "THE GUARDIAN" BY THE JUDGE IN A RECENT HEARING, THAT WOULD HAVE ENSURED THE PROTECTION OF BOTH HER CHILDREN AND ALSO KRISTEN'S.
Comments